Joost de Valk Steps Back From Linux Foundation FAIR Repository Initiative

Joost de Valk has stepped away from the Linux Foundation’s FAIR repository project, citing limited financial support. The initiative seeks to decentralize software distribution and improve supply chain security.

Joost de Valk Steps Back From Linux Foundation FAIR Repository Initiative
Photo by Fikret tozak / Unsplash

Joost de Valk, founder of Yoast SEO, has announced that he is stepping away from the FAIR Package Manager project, an initiative hosted by the Linux Foundation that aims to establish a federated, independent repository system for software components including WordPress themes and plugins. De Valk confirmed his decision in a public statement, citing insufficient financial support and limited industry participation as key factors affecting the project’s viability.

The FAIR project, formally known as the Federated and Independent Repository, was launched in 2025 with the goal of creating decentralized infrastructure for distributing software packages. Its stated purpose is to reduce reliance on centralized repositories and improve software supply chain security, verification, and trust. Although FAIR has broader ambitions beyond WordPress, its origins were closely tied to governance disputes within the WordPress ecosystem.

Background in WordPress Repository Governance

The FAIR initiative emerged amid controversy involving WordPress co-founder Matt Mullenweg and managed WordPress hosting provider WP Engine. In 2025, changes to the WordPress.org plugin repository and access policies affected WP Engine and its customers. These actions raised concerns among developers, hosting providers, and open source contributors about centralized control over software distribution within the WordPress ecosystem.

In response, FAIR was established as a potential alternative model. The project proposed a federated approach, allowing independent repositories to host and distribute plugins and themes while maintaining compatibility and trust verification mechanisms. De Valk was among the early proponents of this approach and played a visible role in its initial development and public communication.

According to public project documentation, FAIR was designed to operate under neutral governance and open standards. Its architecture focuses on cryptographic verification, provenance tracking, and decentralized hosting. These features align with broader industry concerns about software supply chain security and transparency.

Financial and Ecosystem Support Remains Limited

In his announcement, de Valk stated that discussions with hosting companies and other ecosystem participants revealed limited willingness to financially support the project. He attributed this reluctance to the financial and operational commitments required to sustain an independent repository infrastructure.

He wrote that ecosystem participants recognized the technical value of the initiative but were hesitant to invest due to cost, complexity, and associated risks. He did not attribute this hesitancy to a single factor but noted that financial sustainability remained a barrier to progress.

The FAIR project confirmed de Valk’s departure in its own public statement and acknowledged ongoing funding challenges. Project maintainers emphasized that FAIR was established to address software supply chain risks across the broader technology ecosystem, not exclusively WordPress.

According to FAIR project communications, the initiative remains active and continues to accept contributions. The project maintains that decentralized software distribution can improve resilience, transparency, and compliance with emerging regulatory requirements.

Broader Industry Context and Regulatory Considerations

Software supply chain security has become an increasing focus for technology organizations, regulators, and open source communities. Regulatory frameworks such as the European Union’s Cyber Resilience Act, scheduled to take effect in stages beginning in 2027, introduce requirements related to software integrity, traceability, and security assurance.

The FAIR project has identified such regulatory developments as part of its long-term relevance. Its federated repository model is intended to support cryptographic signing, verification, and traceable update mechanisms. These features are designed to align with evolving compliance and security expectations.

The Linux Foundation, which hosts numerous open source infrastructure projects, provides governance support and institutional structure for FAIR. However, Linux Foundation hosting does not automatically guarantee financial sustainability, as projects typically depend on voluntary contributions, sponsorship, or commercial participation.

Impact on Project Visibility and Leadership

De Valk’s departure removes a prominent advocate with strong recognition in the WordPress community. As founder of Yoast SEO, one of the most widely used WordPress plugins, he has long been an influential participant in the ecosystem. His involvement helped draw attention to FAIR’s goals and governance structure.

FAIR project maintainers have stated that the initiative will continue operating under its existing governance model. They emphasized that its mission extends beyond any single individual or platform and that the project’s technical and governance frameworks remain in place.

At present, no replacement spokesperson or equivalent public leadership figure has been formally announced. The project’s future direction will likely depend on continued community engagement, financial contributions, and technical development.

Significance for Open Source Infrastructure Governance

The FAIR initiative reflects ongoing debates within open source communities about centralized versus decentralized infrastructure. Centralized repositories provide efficiency, discoverability, and consistency. However, they also concentrate control and introduce potential single points of dependency.

Federated models, by contrast, distribute responsibility across multiple independent entities. This approach can increase resilience and autonomy but introduces coordination, funding, and governance challenges.

De Valk’s decision to step away highlights the practical difficulties involved in establishing alternative infrastructure models. While the FAIR project continues to operate, its long-term trajectory remains tied to ecosystem participation, governance continuity, and financial sustainability.

For developers, hosting providers, and software distributors, repository governance remains a foundational issue affecting trust, security, and operational independence. The FAIR project represents one approach to addressing these challenges, though its adoption and development remain ongoing.